Department of Administration
658 Cedar St., Suite 300, St. Paul, MN 55155 651-296-6398
Page last modified: Monday, 04-Mar-2013 15:10:15 CST
Tuesday August 19, 2014 11:49:58 PM
|Dept. of Administration / Office of Geographic and Demographic Analysis|
Minnesota Milestones Links
The Office of Geographic and Demographic Analysis is no longer a division of the Dept. of Administration.
The work units which made up this division can be found on the left menu of this page. Resources found on the GDA website are being
migrated to other domains.
Indicator 2 : Low-income school children
Goal: Our children will not live in poverty. Poverty can do both immediate and lasting harm to children. Children who grow up in poverty are more likely to lack adequate food and clothing, live in poor housing, become victims of crime and violence, lack basic health care and be less successful in school.
Rationale: Eligibility for free or reduced-price school meals is an important measure of child poverty trends, because it is updated every year.
About this indicator: The proportion of public school children from low-income families approved for free or reduced-price meals rose from 20.8 percent in 1989-90 to 26.3 percent in 1998-99. After stabilizing between 25 and 26 percent between 1996 and 2000, it fell in 2001, but rose to 26.6 percent in 2002.
Students are eligible for free lunch when family income is below 130 percent of the federal poverty level. They qualify for reduced-price lunch and breakfast when family income is between 130 percent and 185 percent of the poverty level. In 2000-01, 18.2 percent of children qualified for free lunch and 7.5 percent qualified for reduced-price meals.
Not every eligible child participates. It is believed that a smaller proportion of eligible students sign up in the reduced-price category and also that secondary students are less likely to sign up. However, recent research from the U.S. Department of Agriculture indicates discrepancies in reported income, leading to the enrollment of ineligible children.
For comparison: Federal data is collected differently making comparison impossible.
Things to think about: The trend varies widely by school district. Low-income students are more highly concentrated in the Twin Cities area. Both St. Paul and Minneapolis school districts saw large increases in student poverty during the 1990s, an increase of 23 percentage points in St. Paul and 20 percentage points in Minneapolis, while increases in suburban areas were minimal.
Technical notes: The percentages shown are for all school children in kindergarten through twelfth grade enrolled on October 1 of each school year, who are eligible and sign up for the program. Poverty levels are adjusted each year and vary with the size of the family.
Related data trends:
Other related indicators:
Technical problems? Contact: firstname.lastname@example.org