Department of Administration
658 Cedar St., Suite 300, St. Paul, MN 55155 651-296-6398
Page last modified: Monday, 04-Mar-2013 15:10:15 CST
Monday March 10, 2014 05:04:56 PM
|Dept. of Administration / Office of Geographic and Demographic Analysis|
Minnesota Milestones Links
The Office of Geographic and Demographic Analysis is no longer a division of the Dept. of Administration.
The work units which made up this division can be found on the left menu of this page. Resources found on the GDA website are being
migrated to other domains.
Indicator 2 3 : Juvenile apprehensions
Goal: Our communities will be safe, friendly and caring. Minnesotans want to be comfortable and safe in their surroundings. When people feel safe, they are more likely to be involved in their communities. Minnesotans want to live in friendly communities where help is nearby and there is a sense of connectedness.
Rationale: Youth crime is an important factor in community safety. Youth commit a disproportionate share of violent crimes in Minnesota, especially serious property crimes.
About this indicator: Youth apprehensions rose in the early 1990s but have been decreasing since about mid-decade, despite the fact that the youth population has been growing steadily. The rate of apprehensions per 1,000 youth dropped from 35.7 in 1996 to 25.6 in 2000.
Arrests of juveniles are called apprehensions. This rate includes violent crime and property crime (burglary, larceny, motor vehicle theft and arson). In 1999, youth age 10-17 committed 43 percent of all violent and serious property crimes in Minnesota, according to the Department of Public Safety.
The apprehension rate is a different measure than the crime rate. The age of the perpetrator is not available for every crime, only for those that result in an apprehension or arrest. Also, a single apprehension may cover several offenses.
For comparison: In 2000, the national total (violent and property crimes) apprehension rate was 12.4 apprehensions per 1,000 youth (ages 10 to 17), compared to 22.5 in Minnesota. However, the national data is collected by the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), a different source than the Minnesota data reported here, and the two sources collect their data at different times of the year, making comparison difficult.
Things to think about: More populous counties tend to have higher youth apprehension rates, but several smaller rural counties also have high rates. For example, Koochiching County had 50.3 apprehensions and Nobles County had 44.1 apprehensions per 1,000 youth in 2000. Youth apprehension rates in Hennepin and Ramsey counties were 38.6 and 40.8 respectively.
Technical notes: National juvenile apprehension data is collected by the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), a different source than the Minnesota juvenile apprehensions data included in this report. Collection dates for the two sources are at different times of the year, making comparison difficult.
Related data trends:
Other related indicators:
Technical problems? Contact: firstname.lastname@example.org