Department of Administration
658 Cedar St., Suite 300, St. Paul, MN 55155 651-296-6398
Page last modified: Monday, 04-Mar-2013 15:10:15 CST
Wednesday April 23, 2014 07:39:15 PM
|Dept. of Administration / Office of Geographic and Demographic Analysis|
Minnesota Milestones Links
The Office of Geographic and Demographic Analysis is no longer a division of the Dept. of Administration.
The work units which made up this division can be found on the left menu of this page. Resources found on the GDA website are being
migrated to other domains.
Indicator 3 8 : Growth in gross state product
Goal: Minnesota will have sustainable, strong economic growth. Economic growth creates jobs and may increase opportunities for better jobs and improved living standards. Strong and sustainable economic growth can be accomplished through the complementary long-term objectives of economic prosperity and environmental protection. Minnesota has traditionally been recognized as a state with a high quality of life driven by a strong economy. Sustainable, strong economic growth puts Minnesota in a better position to achieve other Minnesota Milestones goals.
Rationale: Gross state product is the most commonly used measure of overall economic production. Continuous growth in gross state product is a strong indication of a healthy economy.
About this indicator: Minnesota's annual real growth in gross state product has been strong and steady since 1996, with growth rates 4.5 percent and higher. Gross state product is the value of all goods and services produced in the state. This economic growth contributed to historically low unemployment levels as well as significant gains in personal income. Strong worker productivity gains during the 1990s were a contributing factor in the robust growth in gross state product.
For comparison: Between 1990 and 2000, Minnesota's gross state product grew faster than the national gross state product in every year except 1990, 1993, 1995 and 1999. Between 1996 and 2000, Minnesota also outperformed the Plains States region as a whole (Iowa, Kansas, Minnesota, Missouri, Nebraska, North Dakota and South Dakota).
Things to think about: While gross state product is a good measure of the overall productivity of an economy, it does not measure general well-being or quality of life. Redefining Progress, a California public policy institute, notes that the gross state product makes no distinction between spending that contributes to well-being and spending that diminishes it. For example, expenditures that result in pollution and expenditures to clean up that pollution both increase the gross state product.
Technical notes: There is at least a two-year lag in reporting gross state product data.
Other related indicators:
Technical problems? Contact: email@example.com