Department of Administration
658 Cedar St., Suite 300, St. Paul, MN 55155 651-296-6398
Page last modified: Monday, 04-Mar-2013 15:10:15 CST
Thursday July 31, 2014 08:29:33 AM
|Dept. of Administration / Office of Geographic and Demographic Analysis|
Minnesota Milestones Links
The Office of Geographic and Demographic Analysis is no longer a division of the Dept. of Administration.
The work units which made up this division can be found on the left menu of this page. Resources found on the GDA website are being
migrated to other domains.
Indicator 4 5 : Poverty rate
Goal: All Minnesotans will have the economic means to maintain a reasonable standard of living. The citizens who helped create Minnesota Milestones stated clearly that income slightly above the poverty level is not adequate for a reasonable standard of living. The indicators for this goal deal with several aspects of employment and income.
Rationale: Measuring the percentage of Minnesotans who live in poverty gives an indication of how many Minnesotans are not financially able to maintain a minimum standard of living.
About this indicator: The percent of Minnesotans in poverty decreased from 10.2 percent in 1990 to 7.9 percent in 2000. The rate was as high as 13 percent in the early 1990s, but fell below 10 percent during the strong economic boom of the late 1990s. The 2000 federal poverty threshold for a family of four was $17,603. Many Minnesotans with incomes above the poverty line still have difficulty making ends meet.
For comparison: Minnesota has historically had lower poverty rates than the nation as a whole. In 2000, when the national rate was 12.4 percent, Minnesota's rate was 7.9 percent, or third in the nation. New Hampshire had the lowest poverty rate at 6.5 percent, while Mississippi had the highest at 19.9 percent.
Things to think about: Because income at the federally determined poverty line affords only a minimal standard of living, critics have argued for a new self-sufficiency measure. Poverty is strongly related to other disturbing social and economic conditions such as poor health, decreased economic opportunity and higher crime rates.
Technical notes: Data shows a two-year average for non-Census years. The averaging method is used to compensate for the margin of error in survey estimates of state poverty rates. The year listed is the last year of the two-year average.
Technical problems? Contact: email@example.com