Department of Administration
658 Cedar St., Suite 300, St. Paul, MN 55155 651-296-6398
Page last modified: Monday, 04-Mar-2013 15:10:15 CST
Saturday April 19, 2014 07:33:45 AM
|Dept. of Administration / Office of Geographic and Demographic Analysis|
Minnesota Milestones Links
The Office of Geographic and Demographic Analysis is no longer a division of the Dept. of Administration.
The work units which made up this division can be found on the left menu of this page. Resources found on the GDA website are being
migrated to other domains.
Indicator 6 3 : Urban air pollution
Goal: Minnesotans will improve the quality of the air, water and earth. Continuously improving the health of Minnesota's natural systems not only ensures continued access to the raw materials that fuel Minnesota's economy, but also protects the irreplaceable roles of healthy natural systems, such as flood and pest control, moderation of the climate and pollination of crops.
Rationale: Air pollution in the Twin Cities metropolitan area, Minnesota's most urbanized region, is one indicator of the state's air quality.
About this indicator: The Twin Cities area has seen dramatic improvement in the number of days above “moderate” levels for six monitored air pollutants. From 1990 to 2000, the frequency dropped from 205 days to 38 days, an 82 percent reduction. The six pollutants are carbon monoxide, nitrogen dioxide, sulfur dioxide, volatile organic compounds, lead and dust. This indicator is based on the Air Pollutant Standards Index developed by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency to provide a simple, uniform way to report daily air pollution concentrations. It does not measure whether certain combinations of pollutants occur.
A downward trend in the six criteria pollutants suggests that regulation and pollution prevention efforts, including reduced emissions in newer cars, have produced significant gains in urban air quality, even while the state's economy and population have grown. Minnesota's vehicle emissions testing program, which ended in 1999, may also have contributed to the emissions reductions.
For comparison: The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency collects national air quality data but uses a different method, making comparisons difficult. Air quality in the Twin Cities region is better than in many other urban areas in the United States. Minnesota's relatively flat terrain and exposure to rapidly moving weather systems allows wind to disperse and carry away air pollution. Also, industry is less concentrated here than in some U.S. cities.
Things to think about: Weather patterns can cause large variations in pollution levels in a single year. For example, hot, dry weather increased the levels of dust and ozone in 1994.
Hundreds of airborne chemicals remain unregulated, including most toxic chemicals and greenhouse gases such as carbon dioxide.
Technical notes: This indicator is based on data collected Monday through Friday in the Twin Cities metropolitan area. A moderate level of pollution is reported if any one of the six criteria pollutants exceeds half the federal standard. The data does not differentiate days when more than one pollutant reaches moderate levels from days when only one pollutant does. Data from the 1998 edition of Minnesota Milestones differ somewhat from data presented here because of revisions by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency. In addition, the agency's reports formerly covered the state's four largest urban areas, but now cover all six of these pollutants only for the Twin Cities area. There are not enough monitoring stations in Rochester, St. Cloud and Duluth to calculate the Air Pollutant Standards Index in those cities.
Technical problems? Contact: email@example.com